Why the study?
Are serum fetuin-A levels associated with carotid arterial stiffness in healthy subjects?
Are serum fetuin-A levels associated with carotid arterial stiffness in healthy subjects?
Serum fetuin-A levels are independently associated with carotid arterial stiffness in healthy subjects, suggesting a potential role in atherosclerosis beyond its known effects in chronic kidney disease.
Associated with carotid stiffness in healthy subjects; extends CKD observations but hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
OBJECTIVE: Fetuin-A is a circulating glycoprotein which is well characterized as an inhibitor of ectopic calcification. Vascular calcification commonly found in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is a predictor of cardiovascular death. Recently, several groups have demonstrated that low fetuin-A levels are associated with mortality in uraemic patients, possibly through regulation of vascular calcification. However, the physiological significance of fetuin-A in atherosclerosis remains unknown, except in specific conditions, such as vascular calcification in CKD patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between serum fetuin-A levels and arterial stiffness, a functional property of atherosclerosis, in healthy subjects. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: The study subjects comprised 141 healthy subjects. We measured serum fetuin-A levels and stiffness parameter beta for the common carotid artery, which was assessed by ultrasound using a phase-locked echo-tracking system. RESULTS: Simple regression analyses indicated that serum fetuin-A levels were significantly correlated with stiffness parameter beta (r = 0.200, P = 0.018). Multiple regression analyses showed that, besides age, fetuin-A (beta = 0.166, P = 0.033) independently contribute to the stiffness parameter beta (R(2) = 0.310, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum fetuin-A level is associated with carotid arterial stiffness, independent of known atherogenic factors in healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mori et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: