Why the study?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring improve the diagnosis and management of hypertension compared to office blood pressure measurements in renal transplant recipients?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring improve the diagnosis and management of hypertension compared to office blood pressure measurements in renal transplant recipients?
ABPM is recommended in renal transplant recipients to accurately diagnose hypertension, eliminate white coat hypertension, and identify high-risk nocturnal nondipping patterns.
May aid nocturnal hypertension detection in renal transplant recipients; leaves open whether ABPM improves outcomes versus office BP in trials.
In renal transplant recipients, hypertension is common and associated with increased cardiovascular and allograft rejection risks. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is required for its accurate diagnosis and adequate treatment, as it clearly offers several advantages over office or casual blood pressure measurements. First, it correlates better with target-organ damage and with cardiovascular mortality. Second, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can eliminate "white coat" hypertension. Most important is the identification of nocturnal hypertension, an independent cardiovascular risk factor. A circadian nondipping pattern is often found in renal transplant recipients, most probably resulting from cyclosporine A and persistent fluid overload in the early posttransplant phase (approximately 70% prevalence), but reflecting an underlying renal (parenchymal or vascular) allograft disease when persistent (approximately 25% prevalence) beyond the first year posttransplant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Covic et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: