Why the study?
Does a 'low probability' V/Q scan predict a low risk of subsequent clinical pulmonary embolism in patients suspected of having PE?
Does a 'low probability' V/Q scan predict a low risk of subsequent clinical pulmonary embolism in patients suspected of having PE?
A 'low probability' V/Q scan in patients suspected of PE is associated with an extremely low risk of subsequent clinical PE over up to one year of follow-up.
Supports low subsequent PE risk after low-probability V/Q; leaves open need for prospective validation before changing practice.
Lung ventilation and perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy is usually indicated when pulmonary embolism (PE) is a suspected diagnosis. Typically, V/Q scintigraphic interpretation is reported as a "normal," "low," "intermediate," or "high probability" of PE. Although a "low probability" interpretation does not exclude the diagnosis of PE, it significantly reduces the likelihood. We retrospectively analyzed up to one year of follow-up in 90 patients who were clinically suspected of having PE, but in whom V/Q scintigraphy implied a low probability of PE. None of the 90 patients demonstrated clinical evidence of PE subsequent to the V/Q scan. Our findings suggest that significant pulmonary embolism is uncommon and that the clinical course appears to be predictable in patients with a low probability V/Q scan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Kahn (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: