Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation is often paroxysmal and minimally symptomatic, hindering diagnosis, and smartwatches may enhance care via long-term, noninvasive monitoring.
Does a smartwatch algorithm accurately detect irregular pulse compared to Holter monitoring in older adults?
Does a smartwatch algorithm accurately detect irregular pulse compared to Holter monitoring in older adults?
A smartwatch algorithm demonstrated high accuracy (98.1%) for detecting irregular pulse compared to Holter monitoring and was highly acceptable to older adults.
May support smartwatch AF monitoring in clinics; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before broader use.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often paroxysmal and minimally symptomatic, hindering its diagnosis. Smartwatches may enhance AF care by facilitating long-term, noninvasive monitoring. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the accuracy and usability of arrhythmia discrimination using a smartwatch. METHODS A total of 40 adults presenting to a cardiology clinic wore a smartwatch and Holter monitor and performed scripted movements to simulate activities of daily living (ADLs). Participants’ clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were abstracted from medical records. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing different domains of the device’s usability. Pulse recordings were analyzed blindly using a real-time realizable algorithm and compared with gold-standard Holter monitoring. RESULTS The average age of participants was 71 (SD 8) years; most participants had AF risk factors and 23% (9/39) were in AF. About half of the participants owned smartphones, but none owned smartwatches. Participants wore the smartwatch for 42 (SD 14) min while generating motion noise to simulate ADLs. The algorithm determined 53 of the 314 30-second noise-free pulse segments as consistent with AF. Compared with the gold standard, the algorithm demonstrated excellent sensitivity (98.2%), specificity (98.1%), and accuracy (98.1%) for identifying irregular pulse. Two-thirds of participants considered the smartwatch highly usable. Younger age and prior cardioversion were associated with greater overall comfort and comfort with data privacy with using a smartwatch for rhythm monitoring, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A real-time realizable algorithm analyzing smartwatch pulse recordings demonstrated high accuracy for identifying pulse irregularities among older participants. Despite advanced age, lack of smartwatch familiarity, and high burden of comorbidities, participants found the smartwatch to be highly acceptable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: