Cross-sectional study reveals high endoscopic healing but low deep remission in ulcerative colitis, highlighting persistent urgency despite mucosal recovery.
BACKGROUND: 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) remains the first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Modern treatment goals extend beyond symptom control to include steroid-free remission, endoscopic healing, and biomarker normalization. Real-world evidence on 5-ASA's ability to achieve these targets is limited. This study assessed remission levels and associated factors in Belgian UC patients in clinical remission on 5-ASA. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multicenter, phase 4 study included UC patients in clinical remission (PRO-2 ≤ 1, no rectal bleeding) treated with 5-ASA for ≥6 months. Patients receiving corticosteroids, immunomodulators, or advanced therapies were excluded. Outcomes were complete clinical remission (PRO-2 = 0, no urgency), endoscopic remission (MES ≤ 1, UCEIS ≤ 1), complete endoscopic remission (MES = 0), histological remission (Geboes 0-1), biological remission (fecal calprotectin <150 µg/g), and deep remission (clinical, endoscopic, and histological). Adherence was assessed using MARS-5. RESULTS: In total, 198 patients were enrolled (median age 50 years; 41% female). Treatment was oral 5-ASA only (n = 134, 68%), rectal only (n = 19, 9%), or combination (n = 45, 23%). Biological remission was observed in 78%, endoscopic remission in 87%, complete endoscopic remission in 70%, and histological remission in 80%. Deep remission occurred in 24%, limited by persistent urgency (63%). Adherence was high (median MARS-5: 24). Oral 5-ASA only was significantly associated with endoscopic remission (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this real-world Belgian cohort, patients in clinical remission on 5-ASA achieved high rates of objective remission, while deep remission was low because of persistent urgency. These findings confirm 5-ASA's continued relevance in mild-to-moderate UC and highlight the importance of addressing residual symptoms despite mucosal healing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reenaers et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: