Systematic review reveals 5-ASA continuation may lower clinical remission odds in ulcerative colitis patients, suggesting careful treatment decisions are needed.
Background and Aims The benefit of continuing 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) escalated to advanced therapies remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-ASA continuation versus discontinuation in this population. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing 5-ASA continuation versus discontinuation in adult patients with UC escalated to advanced therapies. Adjusted effect estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Results The meta-analysis comprised nine observational cohorts and two studies presenting post hoc analyses from eight clinical trials. We included 11,487 patients, with 9,105 assigned to 5-ASA continuation and 2,382 to 5-ASA discontinuation. Compared to discontinuation, 5-ASA continuation was associated with decreased odds of achieving clinical remission (aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99; I2=0%). There were no significant differences between groups for corticosteroid-free clinical remission (aOR 0.71; 95% CI 0.41-1.23; I2=0%), clinical response (aOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.69-1.28; I2=0%), endoscopic healing (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.71-1.41; I2=54.6%), and biochemical remission (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 0.76-1.68; I2=31%). In time-to-event analyses, no significant differences were found between groups for UC-related hospitalization (aHR 0.99; 95% CI 0.86-1.13; I2=0%), UC-related surgery (aHR 1.02; 95% CI 0.80-1.29;; I2=13%), new corticosteroid prescription (aHR 0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.07; I2=0%), composite adverse events (aHR 0.96; 95% CI 0.87-1.06; I2=0%), and loss of response (aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.75-1.12; p = 0.39; I2=61%). Conclusion In patients with UC escalated to advanced therapies, 5-ASA continuation was associated with decreased odds of achieving clinical remission compared to discontinuation, with no significant differences observed for secondary efficacy or safety endpoints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas Mesadri Gewehr (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: