Why the study?
Does sequential cyclophosphamide and adriamycin induction therapy induce remission in patients with Ewing's sarcoma?
Does sequential cyclophosphamide and adriamycin induction therapy induce remission in patients with Ewing's sarcoma?
Sequential cyclophosphamide and adriamycin induction therapy is highly effective in Ewing's sarcoma, allowing for delayed radiotherapy and extensive surgical procedures until remission is induced.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cyclophosphamide-adriamycin induction in Ewing sarcoma; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Twenty-four consecutive patients with Ewing's sarcoma were treated in a protocol designed to deliver induction chemotherapy with postinduction surgical-pathologic evaluation of the primary tumor site. This was followed by delayed radiotherapy, the dose and port of which was dependent on the response to induction chemotherapy. All patients received 5 courses of sequential cyclophosphamide and adriamycin during the 3-mo induction period. Nineteen of 23 evaluable patients had no gross residual tumor following this therapy. Of the remaining 4, 2 had complete surgical excision of residual gross disease. Of the 22 patients who were free of gross tumor following induction chemotherapy and surgery, 5 received no radiotherapy, 16 received moderate-dose limited port radiotherapy (3000-3500 R), and 1 received high-dose limited port radiotherapy (5000 R). All 14 patients with localized disease attained remission and are surviving 9-41+ mo (median 21+) with 2 local recurrences occurring after 10 and 33 mo of remission. Of the 10 patients presenting with metastatic disease, 8 attained complete remission with 4 of the 8 remaining disease-free 12-34+ mo from diagnosis. This study indicates that Ewing's sarcoma is very sensitive to moderate-dose 2 drug chemotherapy of low toxicity and that it is possible to delay radiotherapy and any extensive surgical procedure until remission is induced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayes et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: