Key result
Higher baseline LVM linked to ~194% greater risk of developing depressed LVEF.
Why the study?
Increased left ventricular mass is a known risk factor for heart failure, but whether it is a risk factor for developing a low LVEF had not been determined.
Does increased left ventricular mass predict the development of a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with normal baseline LVEF?
Cohort (n=3,042)
Does increased left ventricular mass predict the development of a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with normal baseline LVEF?
Increased left ventricular mass is an independent risk factor for the development of depressed left ventricular ejection fraction within 5 years.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to determine whether increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a risk factor for the development of a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that increased LVM is a risk factor for heart failure but not whether it is a risk factor for a low LVEF. METHODS: As part of the Cardiovascular Health Study, a prospective population-based longitudinal study, we performed echocardiograms upon participant enrollment and again at follow-up of 4.9 +/- 0.14 years. In the present analysis, we identified 3,042 participants who had at baseline a normal LVEF and an assessment of LVM (either by electrocardiogram or echocardiogram), and at follow-up a measurable LVEF. The frequency of the development of a qualitatively depressed LVEF on two-dimensional echocardiography, corresponding approximately to an LVEF <55%, was analyzed by quartiles of baseline LVM. Multivariable regression determined whether LVM was independently associated with the development of depressed LVEF. RESULTS: Baseline quartile of echocardiographic LVM indexed to body surface area was associated with development of a depressed LVEF (4.8% in quartile 1, 4.4% in quartile 2, 7.5% in quartile 3, and 14.1% in quartile 4 [p < 0.001]). A similar relationship was seen in the subgroup of participants without myocardial infarction (p < 0.001). In multivariable regression that adjusted for confounders, both baseline echocardiographic (p < 0.001) and electrocardiographic (p < 0.001) LVM remained associated with development of depressed LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: Increased LVM as assessed by electrocardiography or echocardiography is an independent risk factor for the development of depressed LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drazner et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Normal left ventricular ejection fraction (n=3,042). Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) vs. Lower left ventricular mass (lower quartiles) was evaluated on Development of a qualitatively depressed LVEF on two-dimensional echocardiography (approximately LVEF <55%) (p=< 0.001). Increased baseline left ventricular mass was associated with developing a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction over 4.9 years (14.1% in highest vs 4.8% in lowest quartile; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: