Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the isolated guinea pig aorta, the prostaglandin I2 analog iloprost (0.01-10 microM) inhibited the contractions induced by the thromboxane A2 analog U46619 (9,11-dideoxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-epoxymethanoprostaglandin F2 alpha; 30 nM) and prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha, 1 microM) in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, iloprost only partially inhibited the high K+ (65.4 mM)-induced contraction. In the muscle stimulated with high K+, verapamil (0.3 and 10 microM) inhibited [Ca2+]i and muscle tension in parallel, whereas iloprost (1 microM) inhibited muscle tension with only a small decrease in [Ca2+]i. In the muscle stimulated with U46619 (30 nM), verapamil and iloprost decreased both [Ca2+]i and muscle tension. However, as compared with the effect of verapamil, iloprost more strongly inhibited muscle tension than [Ca2+]i. The iloprost (0.1-1 microM)-induced relaxation was accompanied by a concentration-dependent increase in cAMP content. It was further demonstrated that inhibition of the U46619-contractions was augmented in the presence of cycloxygenase inhibitors, such as indomethacin (10 microM), ibuprofen (10 microM) and aspirin (10 microM). In contrast, the inhibition of PGF2 alpha-induced contraction was not affected by indomethacin. Similarly, the inhibitory effect of forskolin on U46619-induced contractions, but not on PGF2 alpha-induced contraction, was enhanced by indomethacin. These results suggest that iloprost inhibits vascular smooth muscle contraction by decreasing [Ca2+]i and the Ca2+ sensitivity of contractile elements through a cAMP-dependent mechanism. The results also suggest that in U46619-stimulated muscle, vasoactive prostaglandins that counterbalance the relaxing action of cAMP may be generated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozaki et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: