Why the study?
Does the fibrillin-1 2-3 genotype increase aortic stiffness in healthy men compared to other genotypes?
Does the fibrillin-1 2-3 genotype increase aortic stiffness in healthy men compared to other genotypes?
The fibrillin-1 2-3 genotype in men is associated with increased aortic stiffness and pulse pressure, indicating a potential genetic marker for increased cardiovascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fibrillin-1 2-3 genotype may mark higher vascular risk in men; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Aortic stiffness is a predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The mechanical properties of the arterial wall depend on the connective tissue framework, with variation in fibrillin-1 and collagen I genes being associated with aortic stiffness and/or pulse pressure elevation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether variation in fibrillin-1 genotype was associated with aortic stiffness in men. The mechanical properties of the abdominal aorta of 79 healthy men (range 28-81 yr) were investigated by ultrasonographic phase-locked echo tracking. Fibrillin-1 genotype, characterized by the variable tandem repeat in intron 28, and collagen type I alpha 1 genotype characterized by the 2,064 G>T polymorphism, were determined by using DNA from peripheral blood cells. Three common fibrillin-1 genotypes, 2-2, 2-3, and 2-4, were observed in 50 (64%), 10 (13%), and 11 (14%) of the men, respectively. Those of 2-3 genotype had higher pressure strain elastic modulus and aortic stiffness compared with men of 2-2 or 2-4 genotype (P = 0.005). Pulse pressure also was increased in the 2-3 genotype (P = 0.04). There was no significant association between type 1 collagen genotype and aortic stiffness in this cohort. In conclusion, the fibrillin-1 2-3 genotype in men was associated with increased aortic stiffness and pulse pressure, indicative of an increased risk for cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Powell et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: