Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distractibility with auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus changes was investigated using an audio-visual distraction paradigm. Participants were asked to discriminate between equiprobable short and long audio-visual stimuli. Infrequently, the auditory, the visual, or both parts of the stimuli changed. These rare deviations (deviants) were irrelevant for the actual task. The influence of the three types of deviant stimuli on the processing of task-relevant information was assessed with behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures assuming that bimodal deviants would lead to an increase in distraction. Behavioral and ERP results did not support this assumption, as reaction time (RT) prolongation and components amplitudes did not differ significantly for auditory and bimodal deviants. It is suggested that a maximal threshold of distraction accounts for these results. In addition, the processing of bimodal deviations was assessed. Audio-visual interactions were found following modality-specific deviance detection suggesting that integration only occurs with involuntary attention switching to task-irrelevant changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boll et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: