Why the study?
Heart transplantation survival seems worse with donor/recipient sex mismatch despite contradictory reports, warranting a synthesis of the evidence.
Does donor/recipient sex mismatch increase one-year mortality in patients undergoing heart transplantation?
Does donor/recipient sex mismatch increase one-year mortality in patients undergoing heart transplantation?
Donor/recipient sex mismatch significantly increases one-year mortality after heart transplantation, particularly in male recipients.
Sex mismatch may elevate one-year mortality risk in male heart transplant recipients; extends observational evidence but should not yet change allocation practices.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Heart transplantation (HT) is the treatment for patients with end-stage heart disease. Despite contradictory reports, survival seems to be worse when donor/recipient sex is mismatched. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the evidence on the effect of donor/recipient sex mismatch after HT. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE until November 2017. Comparative cohort and registry studies were included. Published articles were systematically selected and, when possible, pooled in a meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was one-year mortality. RESULTS: After retrieving 556 articles, ten studies (76 175 patients) were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Significant differences were found in one-year survival between sex-matched and mismatched recipients (odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.35, P < .001). In female recipients, we found that sex mismatch was not a risk factor for one-year mortality (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.85-1.00, P = .06). However, in male recipients, we found that it was a risk factor for one-year mortality (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.31-1.44, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Sex mismatch increases one-year mortality after HT in male recipients. Its influence in long-term survival should be further explored with high-quality studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayesta et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: