Legal analysis reveals regulatory deficiencies in Russian electronic commerce, highlighting the need for standardized terminology to balance stakeholder interests in digital trade.
There is no uniformity of terminology in relation to digital (electronic) trade at the legislative level and in the doctrine. To solve the abovementioned problem, it is necessary to determine the legal nature of electronic commerce, its effective implementation in order to ensure a balance of interests of participants in digital trade in Russia. It is concluded that the process of digital trade development cannot fully develop and maximize the interests of participants due to the lack of an appropriate regulatory framework in this area of entrepreneurial activity.In the scientific work strategic directions for ensuring a balance of interests of participants in digital trade are identified, individual conclusions and proposals are formulated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
А. Н. Левушкин (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: