Why the study?
Despite antihypertensive medications, many patients fail to achieve target blood pressure, leading to an evaluation of catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation.
Does catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation reduce systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Does catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation reduce systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation effectively reduces home, office, and daytime systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension, particularly those with non-resistant hypertension.
Supports ultrasound renal denervation as adjunctive hypertension therapy; confirms consistent SBP lowering versus sham in Level 1 meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Hypertension (HTN) is a prevalent chronic health condition that significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases-associated mortalities. Despite the use of antihypertensive medications, numerous patients fail to achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. AIM To evaluates the efficacy of catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) for the treatment of HTN. METHODS Relevant studies were identified through searches in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, with a cut-off date at April 1, 2024. A random-effects model was employed in this study to mitigate potential biases. The risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager version 5.3. This meta-analysis incorporated four studies encompassing a total of 627 patients. The reporting bias of this study was deemed acceptable. RESULTS Compared to the Sham group, the uRDN group demonstrated a significant reduction in daytime ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) [mean difference (MD) -3.87 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.02 to -0.73, P = 0.02], office SBP (MD -4.13 mmHg, 95%CI: -7.15 to -1.12, P = 0.007), and home SBP (MD -5.51 mmHg, 95%CI: -8.47 to -2.55, P < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant reduction observed in either 24-hour or nighttime ambulatory SBP levels. Subgroup analysis shows that uRDN can significantly reduce the SBP in patients with non-resistant HTN (MD -6.19 mmHg, MD -6.00 mmHg, MD -7.72 mmHg, MD -5.02 mmHg, MD -3.61 mmHg). CONCLUSION The current evidence suggests that uRDN may effectively reduce home, office, and daytime SBP in patients with HTN, particularly in those with non-resistant HTN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: