Why the study?
The frequency of off-label DOAC dosing, associated factors, hospital-level variation, and temporal trends among patients hospitalized for AF were unknown in contemporary clinical practice.
What is the frequency and what are the factors associated with off-label DOAC dosing in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation?
What is the frequency and what are the factors associated with off-label DOAC dosing in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation?
Approximately 1 in 10 patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation are discharged on off-label DOAC doses, though adherence to recommended dosing has improved significantly from 2014 to 2020.
Off-label DOAC dosing persists in ~11% of AF hospitalizations; leaves open factors, outcomes, and targeted strategies in real-world cohorts.
Introduction Among patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation (AF), the frequency of off-label direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing, associated factors, hospital-level variation, and temporal trends in contemporary clinical practice are unknown. Methods Using the Get With The Guidelines ® Atrial Fibrillation (GWTG-AF) registry, patients admitted from January 1 st , 2014 to March 31 st , 2020, and discharged on DOAC therapy were stratified according to receipt of underdosing, overdosing, or recommended dosing. Factors associated with off-label dosing were identified using logistic regression. Hospital-level variation and temporal trends were assessed. Results Of 22,470 patients prescribed a DOAC at discharge from hospitalization for AF (66% apixaban, 29% rivaroxaban, 5% dabigatran), underdosing occurred among 2006 (8.9%), overdosing among 511 (2.3%), and recommended dosing among 19953 (88.8%). Patient-related factors associated with off-label DOAC use included age (underdosing: OR 1.06 per 1-year increase [95% CI 1.06-1.07] and overdosing: OR 1.07 per 1-year increase [1.06-1.09]), dialysis dependence (underdosing: OR 5.50 [3.76-8.05] and overdosing: OR 5.47 [2.74-10.88]), female sex (overdosing: OR 0.79 [0.63-0.99]) and weight (overdosing: OR 0.96 per 1-Kg increase [0.95-1.00]). Across hospitals, the adjusted median odds ratio for off-label DOAC use was 1.45 [95% CI 1.34-1.65] (underdosing: 1.52 [1.39-1.76] and overdosing: 1.32 [1.20-1.84]), indicating significant hospital-level variation. Hospital characteristics associated with underdosing included West vs. Northeast location (OR: 1.55 [1.04-2.31]), rural vs. urban setting (OR: 0.48 [0.28-0.83]), and number of beds (<200 vs. 500+, OR: 1.95 [1.29-2.95]). Recommended dosing significantly increased over time (81.9% in 2014 to 90.9% in 2020, p<0.0001 for trend) with a corresponding decline in underdosing (14.4% in 2014 to 6.6% in 2020, p<0.0001 for trend) and overdosing (3.8% in 2014 to 2.5% in 2020, p=0.001 for trend). Conclusion One of 10 patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation is discharged on off-label dosing of DOAC with significant variation across hospitals. While the proportion of patients receiving recommended dosing has significantly improved over time, opportunities to improve DOAC dosing persist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandhu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: