Why the study?
Off-label under- and overdosing of DOACs is not uncommon in real-world practice, prompting evaluation of its efficacy and safety after AF ablation.
Does off-label DOAC dosing affect the incidence of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in patients after atrial fibrillation ablation?
Does off-label DOAC dosing affect the incidence of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in patients after atrial fibrillation ablation?
Off-label DOAC overdosing after AF ablation is infrequent but significantly increases the risk of major bleeding without providing thromboembolic benefit.
Off-label overdose raises major bleeding after AF ablation; leaves open optimal dosing strategies in higher-risk patients.
BACKGROUND: Off-label under- and overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is not uncommon in real-world practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify efficacy and safety of off-label DOACs dose after AF ablation. METHODS: The RYOUMA registry was a prospective multicenter study of Japanese patients who underwent AF ablation between 2017 and 2018. DOAC prescriptions were categorized into on-label standard dose, on-label reduced dose, off-label underdose, and off-label overdose. RESULTS: , and HAS-BLED scores, age, concomitant use of antiplatelets, and lower weight when compared to the on-label standard dose (n = 1809). While the incidence of ischemic stroke after 1 year of off-label underdose was notably low (0.28%), the rate of major bleeding was relatively high (1.7%). Off-label overdose was prescribed to 134 patients (4.8%), who showed a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding (3.0%) compared to on-label standard dose (0.91%; p = 0.02). The off-label overdose group did not have any particular background and its thromboembolic risk was, conversely, low. The most likely cause of off-label overdose was clinicians potentially overlooking dose criteria, including advanced age, low body weight, and low creatinine clearance. CONCLUSIONS: In patients after AF ablation, off-label DOAC overdose was infrequent, but significantly associated with higher incidence of major bleeding during the remote period after AF ablation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered as UMIN000026092 (University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trial Registry).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kino et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: