Blazed, grazing incidence x-ray reflection gratings are an important component of modern high resolution spectrometers and related x-ray optics. These have traditionally been fabricated by diamond scribing in a ruling engine, or more recently by interferometric lithography followed by ion etching. These traditional methods result in gratings which suffer from a number of deficiencies, including high surface roughness and poor control of the groove profile. These deficiencies lead to poor diffraction efficiency and high levels of scattered light. We have developed a novel fabrication method for fabricating blazed x-ray reflection gratings which utilizes silicon wafers that are cut 0.7° off of the (111) plane. In solutions such as potassium hydroxide (KOH), silicon is etched in 〈111〉 directions orders of magnitude slower than in other directions, resulting in extremely smooth {111} facets. The gratings are patterned using interferometric lithography with 351.1 nm wavelength and transferred into the substrate using tri-level resist processing, reactive-ion etching (RIE), and silicon nitride masking during the KOH etch. The narrow (<0.1 μm) ridge of silicon which supports the nitride mask is removed using a chromium lift-off step followed by a CF4 RIE trench etch. The result is a grating with extremely smooth blaze facets which is suitable for x-ray reflection after evaporative coating with thin Cr/Au. Atomic force microscope images confirm that fabricated gratings have less than a 0.4 nm rms roughness—much smoother than conventional gratings which have over ∼1 nm roughness. Theory predicts that reduced blaze facet roughness increases diffraction efficiency. Experiments and simulations performed at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and Columbia University confirm that efficiency is increased; in fact, measured peak efficiencies reach ∼80% of calculated theoretical limits. Peak grating efficiencies were achieved that are ∼35% greater than that of the best available ruled masters of comparable design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franke et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: