Key result
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is being evaluated against usual care in a randomized controlled trial of patients with ischemic heart disease, with no clinical results reported in this protocol.
Why the study?
Despite favorable clinical outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation for ischemic heart disease, referral and attendance rates remain low, necessitating alternative strategies such as home-based programs.
Does home-based cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life, physical activity, and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with ischemic heart disease?
RCT (n=242)
Single-blind (outcome assessors and statistician blinded)
Permuted block randomization
Yes
Does home-based cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life, physical activity, and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with ischemic heart disease?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to usual care for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic heart disease in Iran.
Background: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of mortality all around the world. Patients with Ischemic heart disease (IHD) are at an increased risk of ischemic events; therefore, secondary prevention measures should continue for these patients. Although Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is one of the secondary prevention measures for IHD patients which has favorable clinical outcomes, only 50% of patients are referred and among them, a small percentage attends CR. Therefore, other strategies should be considered, one of which is home-based cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: A multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial has been conducting in three hospitals in Isfahan and patients have been assigned into a 1:1 ratio for the evaluation of the effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care. Psycho-educational consultation based on the Health Action Process Approach including heart-healthy diet, stress management, lifestyle changes, smoking cessation, and physical activity has been performed. Primary outcomes, including the quality of life, psychological and smoking status, body mass index, blood pressure, blood cholesterol level, and physical activity level have been measured at 6 months after the randomization and intervention. One year after the intervention, primary and secondary outcomes, including cardiovascular events, the frequency of hospital admissions, and the death rates due to cardiovascular reasons will be assessed. Conclusion: HBCR program can increase patient accessibility to CR services its implantation can be reduce burden IHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted an RCT in Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) (n=242). Comprehensive Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (HBCR) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak), quality of life, psychological and smoking status, BMI, blood pressure, blood cholesterol, and physical activity level at 6 months. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is being evaluated against usual care in a randomized controlled trial of patients with ischemic heart disease, with no clinical results reported in this protocol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: