Key result
The presence of a respiratory compensation point during exercise testing in cardiac patients was associated with significantly higher peak oxygen uptake (20.2 vs 13.6 mL/min/kg) and better cardiopulmonary function.
Why the study?
Does the presence of a respiratory compensation point during exercise testing indicate better cardiopulmonary function in cardiac patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=152)
No
Does the presence of a respiratory compensation point during exercise testing indicate better cardiopulmonary function in cardiac patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 20.2% vs 13.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
The presence of respiratory compensation during heavy exercise indicates better cardiopulmonary function in cardiac patients.
May aid exercise test interpretation in cardiac patients; leaves open prognostic value and needs prospective validation.
Ventilation (VE) increases linearly with the increase of carbon dioxide output (VCO2) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. VE-VCO2 slope rises in parallel with exercise intensity, reaches a turning point (called the RC point), then steepens because of respiratory compensation for lactic acidosis. While this RC point can be identified universally, it is undetectable in some patients. In this study we evaluated whether the respiratory compensation during exercise testing has clinical significance in cardiac patients. In total, 152 cardiac patients with a respiratory exchange ratio at peak exercise (peak R) of between 1.10 and 1.20 were enrolled. Cardiopulmonary parameters were compared between patients who manifested the RC point (n = 118) and those who did not (n = 34). The peak R did not significantly differ between these two groups. Compared to the patients without the RC point, those with the RC point had a higher oxygen uptake at peak exercise (peak VO2) (20.2 ± 5.3 vs 13.6 ± 3.4 mL/min/kg, p < 0.001), higher anaerobic threshold (AT) (12.4 ± 3.2 vs 9.2 ± 2.3 mL/min/kg, p < 0.001), and lower VE-VCO2 slope (31.7 ± 5.8 vs 37.8 ± 9.6, p = 0.001). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) tended to be lower in the patients with the RC point (175.4 ± 364.7 vs 327.9 ± 381.1 pg/mL, p = 0.067). Peak VO2, the marker of cardiopulmonary function, was found to be the independent predictor of the presence of the RC point. The present findings suggest that the phenomenon of respiratory compensation during heavy exercise indicates better cardiopulmonary function in cardiac patients within a prescribed range of effort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac disease (n=152). Presence of respiratory compensation point vs. Absence of respiratory compensation point was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) in mL/min/kg (p=<0.001). The presence of a respiratory compensation point during exercise testing in cardiac patients was associated with significantly higher peak oxygen uptake (20.2 vs 13.6 mL/min/kg) and better cardiopulmonary function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: