Key result
LVEF <40% in patients undergoing PCI for three-vessel disease was associated with higher 2-year major adverse cardiac events than LVEF ≥40% (19.64% vs 8.73%; OR 1.827, 95% CI 1.187-2.813).
Why the study?
Does depressed LVEF (<40%) increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with three-vessel coronary disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=4,335)
Does depressed LVEF (<40%) increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with three-vessel coronary disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
In patients with three-vessel coronary disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, depressed LVEF (<40%) is strongly associated with increased risks of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiac events at two years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVEF <40% marks elevated 2-year MACE risk after three-vessel PCI; leaves open whether LVEF-directed interventions improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) represent a high risk group of patients for coronary revascularization. There are limited data on percutaneous coronary intervention treatment in this population. METHODS: Among a cohort of 4335 patients with three-vessel disease with or without left main disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, 191 patients had LVEF < 40% (low ejection fraction (EF)) and 4144 patients had LVEF ≥ 40%. In-hospital and long-term outcomes were examined according to LVEF. RESULTS: The estimated two-year rates of major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, and myocardial infarction were significantly higher in the low EF group (19.64% vs. 8.73%, Log-rank test: P < 0.01; 10.30% vs. 1.33%, Log-rank test: P < 0.01, and 10.32% vs. 2.28%, Log-rank test: P < 0.01 respectively), but there was no difference in the rates of target vessel revascularization (6.18% vs. 6.11%, Log-rank test: P = 0.96). Using the Cox proportional hazard models, LVEF < 40% was a significant risk factor for cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiac events (OR (95%CI): 4.779 (2.369 - 9.637), 2.673 (1.353 - 5.282), and 1.827 (1.187 - 2.813) respectively), but was not a statistically significant risk factor for target vessel revascularization (OR (95%CI): 1.094 (0.558 - 2.147)). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction remains associated with further risk of cardiac death in-hospital and during long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in three-vessel coronary disease (n=4,335). LVEF < 40% vs. LVEF ≥ 40% was evaluated on major adverse cardiac events (OR 1.827, 95% CI 1.187 - 2.813, p=< 0.01). LVEF <40% in patients undergoing PCI for three-vessel disease was associated with higher 2-year major adverse cardiac events than LVEF ≥40% (19.64% vs 8.73%; OR 1.827, 95% CI 1.187-2.813).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: