Key result
Lipopolysaccharide treatment of subcutaneous adipose tissue explants from lean women increased IL-6 and TNF-a mRNA levels by 16- and 12-fold, respectively, and increased free fatty acid release, whereas visceral adipose tissue was only mildly affected.
Why the study?
Does lipopolysaccharide induce different inflammatory and glyceroneogenesis responses in subcutaneous versus visceral adipose tissue explants from lean women?
Does lipopolysaccharide induce different inflammatory and glyceroneogenesis responses in subcutaneous versus visceral adipose tissue explants from lean women?
Subcutaneous adipose tissue from lean women is more sensitive to LPS-induced inflammation and decreased glyceroneogenesis than visceral adipose tissue, potentially contributing to systemic lipid disorders.
Subcutaneous adipose explants show greater LPS sensitivity; leaves open contributions to human lipid disorders.
OBJECTIVE: Experimental endotoxaemia induces subcutaneous adipose tissue inflammation and systemic insulin resistance in lean subjects. Glyceroneogenesis, by limiting free fatty acids (FFA) release from adipocytes, controls FFA homoeostasis and systemic insulin sensitivity. The roles of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in metabolic deregulation are intrinsically different. We compared the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the inflammation profiles of SAT and VAT explants from lean women, as well as on glyceroneogenesis, to test whether these two fat depots have intrinsically different responses to this metabolic endotoxin. DESIGN: Abdominal SAT and VAT explants from eight lean women were treated in vitro with LPS. Their inflammatory status was evaluated by cytokine gene expression and secretion; glyceroneogenesis was evaluated by cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase activity and FFA vs glycerol release. RESULTS: In the basal state, the cytokine status and expression of macrophage markers were lower in SAT than VAT. In the presence of 100 ng ml(-1) LPS, SAT exhibited a strong inflammatory response (increased interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α expression) and increased release of FFA due to inhibition of glyceroneogenesis, whereas VAT was only mildly affected. The effects of LPS on both tissues were blocked by the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) inhibitor, parthenolide. A significant effect of LPS on VAT occurred only at 1 μg ml(-1) LPS. CONCLUSION: SAT explants from lean women are more sensitive to LPS-induced NF-κB activation than are VAT explants, leading to a depot-specific dysfunction of FFA storage. As SAT is the major player in FFA homoeostasis, this SAT dysfunction could be associated with visceral fat hypertrophy and systemic lipid disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vatier et al. (2012) studied Healthy lean women (tissue donors) (n=8). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) vs. Untreated explants was evaluated on IL-6 and TNF-a mRNA expression and free fatty acid release. Lipopolysaccharide treatment of subcutaneous adipose tissue explants from lean women increased IL-6 and TNF-a mRNA levels by 16- and 12-fold, respectively, and increased free fatty acid release, whereas visceral adipose tissue was only mildly affected.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: