Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: This study analyzed real-world data to assess patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (eBC), as data for this patient group are limited. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of patients in a US electronic health record-derived deidentified database. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were analyzed overall and by risk of recurrence (high-risk versus non-high-risk). Results: Of 1290 patients, 366 (28.4%) were classified as high-risk and 924 (71.6%) as non-high-risk. At 5 years, high-risk versus non-high-risk eBC had a lower probability of invasive disease-free survival (72.3% [95% CI: 66.8–77.1%] vs. 80.7% [95% CI: 77.6–83.5%]), distant recurrence-free survival (78.7% [95% CI: 74.1–83.6%] vs. 89.3% [95% CI: 86.9–91.7%]), and overall survival (86.9% [95% CI: 82.3–90.4%] vs. 91.8% [95% CI: 89.4–93.7%]), and a shorter time to mBC diagnosis (22.6 vs. 34.1 months, respectively). Neoadjuvant therapy use increased from 18.2% in 2011–2013 to 67.3% in 2018–2021 in high-risk eBC and from 4.1% to 34.4% in non-high-risk eBC. However, 32.7% of eligible patients with high-risk eBC did not receive neoadjuvant therapy in 2018–2021. Use of post-neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy increased in high-risk (but not non-high-risk) eBC from 81.8% in 2011–2013 to 91.8% in 2018–2021. Conclusions: High-risk HER2+ eBC manifested more aggressively than non-high-risk eBC. Utilization of neoadjuvant and (post-neo)adjuvant therapy increased over time. However, despite guideline recommendations, uptake of neoadjuvant therapy remains suboptimal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahtani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: