Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a comparison between two different approaches for calculating anharmonic frequencies, namely mean-field grid-based methods (VSCF, CC-VSCF, VCI) and those obtained by second-order perturbation theory from the third and fourth energy derivatives. For a meaningful comparison between the two approaches we report the results for the anharmonic frequencies with the two approaches for the F−(H2O), Cl−(H2O), HNO3 and HNO3(H2O) molecular systems at the same level of electronic structure theory and basis set. The two methods were found to produce results of similar accuracy for the origin of the fundamental band and selected overtone and combination bands. The optimal equilibrium and vibrationally averaged geometries, spectroscopic constants and anharmonic frequencies of the (HF) n , n = 2–4 clusters are reported at the MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory based on calculations of higher energy derivatives and compared to previous results obtained from CC-VSCF calculations at the MP2/TZP level of theory. Anharmonic vibrational spectra of hydrogen bonded clusters: comparison between higher energy derivative and mean-field grid based methodsAll authorsSotiris S. Xantheashttps://doi.org/10.1080/01442350600922564Published online:11 October 2010Table Download CSVDisplay Table
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sotiris S. Xantheas (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: