Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 13, 2017Anesthesia & Analgesia

Bias in Before–After Studies: Narrative Overview for Anesthesiologists

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

This narrative overview highlights potential sources of bias in before-after studies and provides mitigating strategies to better equip anesthesiologists in designing and appraising such research.

Design

Review

Authors

AHAnthony M.‐H. HoRPRachel PhelanGMGlenio B. Mizubuti

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Anesthesiologists should scrutinize before-after studies for bias; extends methodological guidance for rigorous perioperative research appraisal.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Ho et al. (2017) reported a review. This narrative overview highlights potential sources of bias in before-after studies and provides mitigating strategies to better equip anesthesiologists in designing and appraising such research.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a883fa8ab77196d53aa72edhttps://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002705
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1That Was Then, This Is Now! The Value of Observing Change1998 · 3 citations
  2. 2The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Major Anesthesiology Journals2005 · 30 citations
  3. 3Quantifying possible bias in clinical and epidemiological studies with quantitative bias analysis: common approaches and limitations2024 · 43 citations
  4. 4The Enduring Table 1 Fallacy: A Meta-Research Study of Baseline Testing in Anesthesiology and Pain Trials2025
  5. 5Basics, common errors and essentials of statistical tools and techniques in anesthesiology research2015 · 26 citations