Key result
A newly developed rapid chromatographic immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies 3D1 and 5B10 demonstrated good specificity and sufficient sensitivity for the detection of human metapneumovirus.
A newly developed rapid chromatographic immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies against the hMPV N protein shows promise as a diagnostic test for hMPV infections.
Should not change clinical hMPV testing; hypothesis-generating for rapid antigen assays and requires human validation.
Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) nucleocapsid (N) protein is a major structural protein that encapsidates the RNA genome and is essential for replication and transcription of the hMPV genome. We developed two mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), designated 3D1 and 5B10, against N protein of hMPV and characterized them by an immunofluorescence assay and an immunoprecipitation assay using Trichoplusia ni (Tn5) insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus-expressing hMPV N protein. Both MAbs were found to be reactive to two groups of hMPV by an immunofluorescence assay using two groups of hMPV-infected cells. A chromatographic immunoassay (lateral flow assay) was developed using the MAbs. The assay is a sandwich immunoassay that uses a paper membrane with a gold colloid-conjugated MAb (5B10) in a liquid phase and an MAb (3D1) in a solid phase. We preliminarily examined the sensitivity and specificity using hMPV-infected cells, Tn5 insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus-expressing hMPV N protein, hMPV, and purified N protein. The assay had good specificity and sufficient sensitivity to detect hMPV. Therefore, the assay may be a rapid and useful test for diagnosis of hMPV infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kikuta et al. (2007) studied Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infection. Rapid chromatographic immunoassay using MAbs 3D1 and 5B10 was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for detecting hMPV. A newly developed rapid chromatographic immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies 3D1 and 5B10 demonstrated good specificity and sufficient sensitivity for the detection of human metapneumovirus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: