Key result
In a canine model of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, allopurinol significantly attenuated the increase in atrial fibrillation duration compared to placebo (0.6 vs 173 seconds, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does allopurinol prevent atrial fibrillation promotion in a canine model of atrial pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction?
Does allopurinol prevent atrial fibrillation promotion in a canine model of atrial pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.6% vs 173%
p-value: p=<0.05
Xanthine oxidase inhibition with allopurinol prevents electrical and structural atrial remodeling and suppresses AF promotion in a canine model of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.
Hypothesis-generating for allopurinol in AF with LV dysfunction; human trials needed before clinical consideration.
AIMS: Oxidative stress could be a possible mechanism and a therapeutic target of atrial fibrillation (AF). Xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibition reduces oxidative stress, but the effects of XO inhibitor on AF have not been evaluated. Hence, we assessed the effects of XO inhibitor, allopurinol, on progression of atrial vulnerability in dogs associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: The dogs were subjected to atrial tachypacing (ATP, 400 bpm) without atrioventricular block for 4 weeks. The dynamics of atrial-tachycardia remodeling were evaluated in allopurinol-treated dogs (ALO, n = 5), placebo-treated controls (CTL, n = 6), and sham-operated dogs (n = 6). In CTL dogs, 4 weeks of ATP significantly increased AF duration (DAF; from 0.2 ± 0.2 seconds to 173 ± 67 seconds, P < 0.05) and decreased atrial effective refractory period (ERP; from 152 ± 9 milliseconds to 80 ± 4 milliseconds at a cycle length of 350 milliseconds, P < 0.01). Allopurinol attenuated the ATP effects on ERP (118 ± 6 milliseconds, P < 0.01) or DAF (0.6 ± 0.3 seconds, P < 0.05). In CTL dogs, ATP-induced rapid ventricular responses decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; from 58.6 ± 0.1 to 23.5 ± 2.4%, P < 0.01), and increased left atrial diameter (LAD; from 17 ± 1 mm to 24 ± 1 mm, P < 0.01). ATP increased atrial fibrosis when compared with sham-operated dogs (CTL 10.7 ± 0.8% vs Sham 1.1 ± 0.3%, P < 0.01). Allopurinol suppressed atrial fibrosis (2.3 ± 0.6%, P < 0.01 vs CTL) and eNOS reduction without affecting LVEF (20.6 ± 2.2%, ns) and LAD (23 ± 1 mm, ns). CONCLUSION: Allopurinol suppresses AF promotion by preventing both electrical and structural remodeling. These results suggest that XO may play an important role in enhancement of atrial vulnerability, and might be a novel target of AF therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakabe et al. (2012) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=17). Allopurinol vs. Placebo was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation duration (DAF) in seconds (p=<0.05). In a canine model of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy, allopurinol significantly attenuated the increase in atrial fibrillation duration compared to placebo (0.6 vs 173 seconds, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: