Why the study?
Does intravenous HMR 1556 alter electrophysiological parameters and atrial fibrillation duration in anesthetized dogs?
Does intravenous HMR 1556 alter electrophysiological parameters and atrial fibrillation duration in anesthetized dogs?
Selective slow delayed-rectifier current inhibition affects atrial repolarization, sinus node function, and atrial fibrillation in vivo, particularly when rapid delayed-rectifier current is suppressed, illustrating the importance of repolarization reserve.
Premature for clinical AF use; leaves open whether selective IKs inhibition merits human repolarization studies.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the in vivo electrophysiological effects of a highly selective slow delayed-rectifier K+-current blocker, HMR 1556, to gain insights into the consequences of selectively inhibiting the slow delayed-rectifier current in vivo. METHODS: Atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods, sinus node recovery time, Wenckebach cycle-length, atrial fibrillation duration and electrocardiographic intervals were measured before and after intravenous HMR 1556. RESULTS: HMR 1556 increased atrial and ventricular refractory periods (e.g. by 6 +/- 4% and 27 +/- 6% at cycle lengths of 360 and 400 ms, respectively), QT intervals and sinus-node recovery times. Beta-adrenoceptor blockade with nadolol abolished all effects except those on ventricular refractoriness and changed positive use-dependent effects on refractoriness to reverse use-dependent ones. In the presence of dofetilide to block rapid delayed-rectifier current, HMR 1556 effects were potentiated (e.g. atrial and ventricular refractory periods increased by 26 +/- 3% and 34 +/- 3% at cycle lengths of 360 and 400 ms, respectively). HMR 1556 reduced vagal atrial fibrillation duration from 1077 +/- 81 to 471 +/- 38 s, an effect abolished by nadolol and greatly potentiated by dofetilide (duration 77 +/- 30 s). HMR 1556 increased Wenckebach cycle length only in the presence of dofetilide. CONCLUSIONS: Slowed delayed-rectifier current inhibition affects atrial repolarization, sinus node function and atrial fibrillation in vivo, but only in the presence of intact beta-adrenergic tone, and delays ventricular repolarization even when beta-adrenoceptors are blocked. The slow delayed-rectifier current is particularly important when rapid delayed-rectifier current is suppressed, illustrating the importance of repolarization reserve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiroaki Nakashima (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: