Key result
Integrating palliative care into heart failure management is supported by key strategies identified across 130 documents, including protected time for education and credible champions.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to develop a programme theory of why, for whom, and in what contexts integrated PC and HF services work or do not work, and to co-produce intervention strategies to inform best practice.
Systematic Review (n=130)
Integrating palliative care into heart failure management requires protected educational time, credible champions, and prioritization of guidelines to ensure stakeholders have the capacity, opportunity, and motivation to implement it.
Prioritizing protected education time, champions, and guidelines may enable PC-HF integration; extends programme theory for implementation research.
OBJECTIVES: (1) Develop a programme theory of why, for whom and in what contexts integrated palliative care (PC) and heart failure (HF) services work/do not work; (2) use the programme theory to co-produce with stakeholders, intervention strategies to inform best practice and future research. METHODS: A systematic review of all published articles and grey literature using a realist logic of analysis. The search strategy combined terms significant to the review questions: HF, PC and end of life. Documents were included if they were in English and provided data relevant to integration of PC and HF services. Searches were conducted in November 2021 in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, AMED, HMIC and CINAHL. Further relevant documents were identified via monthly alerts (up until April 2023) and the project stakeholder group (patient/carers, content experts and multidisciplinary practitioners). RESULTS: 130 documents were included (86 research, 22 literature reviews, 22 grey literature). The programme theory identified intervention strategies most likely to support integration of PC and HF services. These included protected time for evidence-based PC and HF education from undergraduate/postgraduate level and continuing professional practice; choice of educational setting (eg, online, face-to-face or hybrid); increased awareness and seeing benefits of PC for HF management; conveying the emotive and intellectual need for integrating PC and HF via credible champions; and prioritising PC and HF guidelines in practice. CONCLUSIONS: The review findings outline the required steps to take to increase the likelihood that all key players have the capacity, opportunity and motivation to integrate PC into HF management. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021240185.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McConnell et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure (n=130). Integrated palliative care and heart failure services was evaluated on Programme theory identifying intervention strategies most likely to support integration of palliative care and heart failure services. Integrating palliative care into heart failure management is supported by key strategies identified across 130 documents, including protected time for education and credible champions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: