Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The validity of a technique for estimating premorbid intellectual functioning based on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R; D. Wechsler, 1981) subtest performance and demographic information used in a best-performance fashion was investigated. Premorbid IQ scores were predicted using the highest score from (a)a11 11 R. D. Vanderploeg and J. A. Schinka (1995) regression equations (BEST-11) and (b) the 3 most robust regression equations (BEST-3). These results were compared with premorbid estimates based solely on demographic information. In the WAIS-R standardization sample the BEST methods were more highly correlated with actual WAIS-R IQ than were A. Barona et al. (1984) estimates. The BEST-11 and BEST-3 approaches resulted in overestimates of about 9 points and 5 points, respectively. In matched samples of neurologic patients and normal controls, Pearson correlations between actual and estimated IQ scores were significantly higher for the BEST-3 than the Barona et al. method. The BEST-3 method also was superior at predicting group membership (normal vs. brain-damaged). These studies support the use of the BEST-3 approach to premorbid estimation of cognitive abilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanderploeg et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: