Why the study?
Stress monitoring has historically relied on physical tests and questionnaires that depend on subjective and potentially inaccurate user-inputted data.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
May facilitate objective stress monitoring in practice; leaves open validation trials before clinical adoption.
The stress response allows the body to overcome obstacles and prepare for threats, but sustained levels of stress can damage one's health. Stress has long been measured through physical tests and questionnaires that rely primarily on user-inputted data, which can be subjective and inaccurate. To quantify the amount of stress that the body is experiencing biologically, analytical detection of biomarkers associated with the stress response recently have been developed. Novel stress sensing devices focus on cortisol sweat sensing as a part of wearable, flexible devices. These devices promise a real-time, continuous collection of stress data that can be used in clinical diagnoses or for personal stress monitoring and mediation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samson et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: