Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is the second leading cause of mortality in cancer survivors, but epidemiological data on onco-CVD have been lacking.
The proportion of acute inpatients with both cancer and cardiovascular disease, particularly heart failure, significantly increased in Japan from 2011 to 2015, highlighting the growing clinical importance of onco-cardiology.
May support integrated onco-cardiology inpatient care; leaves open causal drivers and optimal management strategies.
BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer were able to live longer due to improvements in cancer treatment. Additionally, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the second leading cause of mortality in cancer survivors. However, epidemiological data on onco-CVD have not been sufficiently provided. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of cancer in CVD patients using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB). METHOD AND RESULTS: The NDB sampling dataset used in this study was randomly sampled 10% from the whole Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records from every January, April, July, and October from 2011 to 2015. The significance of the increase trend in the percentage of records in each disease group to the total number of all DPC records from 2011 to 2015 was checked with Chi-square test with a Bonferroni correction. The percentage of records in cancer with the CVD group to the total number of all DPC records significantly increased over time, and their average age also increased since 2011. Their proportion over 75 years was approximately 56 % in 2015. There was no difference in the cancer sites. However, the prevalence of heart failure dramatically elevated. CONCLUSION: We were able to assess the increase in cancer among CVD patients using DPC inpatient records obtained from the NDB. Both cardiologists and oncologists should be more aware of this phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nohara‐Shitama et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: