A tailored dietary self-management program is feasible and acceptable for older adults with heart disease and low literacy, empowering them to manage heart-healthy eating behaviors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open efficacy in larger trials for low-literacy older adults with heart disease.
AIMS: To develop a dietary self-management programme for salt-, fluid-, fat- and cholesterol-intake behaviours for older adults with low literacy and heart disease and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the programme. BACKGROUND: Eating behaviours such as fluid, salt, fat and cholesterol intake are an important factor related to heart disease outcomes. People with low literacy have difficulty following recommended health behaviours, but limited research has investigated intervention programmes for this population. DESIGN: Programme development and pilot testing its feasibility and acceptability. Recommendations were also collected from participants and the research assistant for future large-scale interventions. METHODS: The study had two phases. Phase I consisted of programme development based on previous qualitative findings, a systematic review of the literature, clinical practice experience and expert opinion. In Phase II, we pilot tested the programme from January - June 2014 in a convenience sample of 10 older adults with low literacy, heart disease and recruited from a medical centre in northern Taiwan. RESULTS: Pilot testing showed that our programme was feasible and acceptable to older adults with low literacy and heart disease. Moreover, the final version of the programme was revised based on participants' and the research assistant's recommendations. CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that with guidance and assistance, older adults with low literacy and heart disease can be motivated to take action for their health and are empowered by learning how to self-manage their heart-healthy eating behaviours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: