Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Digital dermoscopy has been shown to permit an earlier detection of melanoma. However, few studies have investigated its added value in reducing unnecessary excisions in everyday clinical practice. methods: dermoscopy alone with little training, dermoscopy alone with adequate training and dermoscopy with adequate training and access to digital dermoscopy, and to confirm the safety of this latter approach. METHODS: Thirty-six dermatologists working without digital dermoscopy were divided into two groups according to their training in dermoscopy. The third group constituted of two dermatologists working in a pigmented lesion clinic with access to the digital dermoscopy technique and eight additional dermatologists working in the same dermatology department. These 46 dermatologists included all presumed melanocytic lesions excised over a period of 1 year. The primary endpoint was the melanoma/nonmelanoma ratio (M/NM-R); secondary endpoints were the ratio of 'problem' naevi to common naevi (PN/CN-R), specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of melanoma, in situ/invasive melanoma ratio, and the mean Breslow thickness. RESULTS: In total, 1865 excised lesions, including 231 melanomas, were included. In the digital dermoscopy availability group (DD-G) the M/NM-R was significantly better (1/2.43), as was the PN/CN-R (1/1.48) (P < 0.001 in both cases). The specificity was significantly higher in the DD-G and significantly higher for trained examiners as compared with examiners with little training. More that one-third of all melanomas discovered by digital dermoscopy were in situ, and the mean Breslow thickness was 0.32 mm for the invasive ones. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of unnecessary excisions when using digital dermoscopy compared with dermoscopy alone in our study suggests that access to digital dermoscopy offers a better management of pigmented lesions in daily practice. The high number of early lesions diagnosed by this technique confirms that its use is safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tromme et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: