Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide A rotary temperature swing adsorption process (RTSA) coupled with a cryogenic purification unit (CPU) was evaluated for capturing and concentrating CO 2 from the natural gas combustion cycle (NGCC) flue gas. With a Lewatit sorbent, a 4-step RTSA process coupled with CPU was optimized to study the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and specific primary energy consumption for CO 2 avoided (SPECCA). The RTSA process was able to concentrate the CO 2 to 95% on a dry basis, and with the addition of the CPU, the CO 2 was concentrated to 100%. From the optimization of the process, the LCOE was found to be 86.2 €/MWh. The SPECCA value was 2.29 MJ/kg. The cost of CO 2 avoided was 76.4€/tonne. The LCOE of the RTSA process was 6% lower compared to a fixed bed containing monoliths, while the SPECCA was higher due to the high steam velocities chosen by the optimizer for the RTSA process. For the 4-step TSA process with a steam purge step, nearly 99% of the specific energy consumption was due to the steam generation process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnamurthy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: