Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
At the pre- and post-processing stages of a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation, important tasks are carried out that require knowledge of the port data (propagation constants, fields, impedances, and so on) of the problem structure. This paper introduces a 2D finite-difference frequency-domain (FDFD) eigenvalue formulation specifically tailored for the computation of port data to be used in conjunction with the 3D-FDTD method. A key feature of the proposed FDFD scheme is that it leads to the same numerical dispersion equation as that of the 3D-FDTD method. This means that, for a given frequency, the numerical propagation constants and mode patterns calculated by the two methods are identical. This is desirable for preserving the accuracy of the FDTD simulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereda et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: