Why the study?
Hypertension is the primary cardiovascular risk factor in Africa, but the clinical efficacy and tolerability of low-dose triple combination antihypertensive therapy remain unclear.
Does a 2-pill or 3-pill low-dose strategy improve blood pressure control compared to stepped monotherapy in adults with untreated hypertension?
Does a 2-pill or 3-pill low-dose strategy improve blood pressure control compared to stepped monotherapy in adults with untreated hypertension?
In African adults with untreated hypertension, starting with a low-dose 2-pill combination was noninferior to stepped monotherapy for blood pressure control at 12 weeks, though superiority was not demonstrated for 2-pill or 3-pill strategies.
Initial 2-pill combination is noninferior for BP control in untreated hypertension; extends options for low-dose strategies without superiority.
Importance: Hypertension is the primary cardiovascular risk factor in Africa. Recently revised World Health Organization guidelines recommend starting antihypertensive dual therapy; clinical efficacy and tolerability of low-dose triple combination remain unclear. Objectives: To compare the effect of 3 treatment strategies on blood pressure control among persons with untreated hypertension in Africa. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an open-label, parallel, 3-arm randomized clinical trial to evaluate noninferiority of a strategy starting 2 pills vs full-dose monotherapy with stepped escalation (noninferiority margin 10%) and superiority of starting low-dose 3 pills vs monotherapy allowing for monthly up titration. Recruitment lasted from March 5, 2020, to March 30, 2022. The setting was 2 hospitals in rural Lesotho and Tanzania. Participants included nonpregnant Black African individuals 18 years and older with uncomplicated, untreated hypertension (standardized office blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg systolic or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic). Interventions: Participants were randomized 2:2:1 to stepped monotherapy (amlodipine, 10 mg, with escalation to add hydrochlorothiazide if needed), 2-pill strategy (amlodipine, 5 mg; losartan, 50 mg), or 3-pill strategy (amlodipine, 2.5 mg; losartan, 12.5 mg; hydrochlorothiazide, 6.25 mg). Drugs were up titrated monthly until reaching the target blood pressure (≤ 130/80 mm Hg for participants aged <65 years; ≤140/90 mm Hg for those aged ≥65 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of participants reaching target blood pressure at 12 weeks. Results: Of 1761 participants screened, 1268 were enrolled (median [IQR] age, 54 [45-65] years; 914 female [72%]), with 505 in the monotherapy cohort, 510 in the 2-pill cohort, and 253 in the 3-pill cohort. In noninferiority analyses, 207 of 370 participants (56%) receiving the 2-pill strategy and 173 of 338 participants (51%) receiving the stepped monotherapy strategy achieved the blood pressure target (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.87-1.61), fulfilling noninferiority. In superiority analyses after multiple imputation for missing outcome data, 57% of participants receiving the 3-pill strategy, 55% receiving the 2-pill strategy, and 49% receiving the stepped monotherapy strategy reached the target blood pressure (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94-1.63; P = .12 and aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.91-1.79; P = .16 for the 2-pill and 3-pill vs stepped monotherapy strategies, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial show that in 2 African settings, for adults with uncomplicated untreated hypertension, a strategy starting a 2-pill low-dose treatment was noninferior to starting stepped monotherapy. Two-pill and 3-pill low-dose strategies were not superior to stepped monotherapy. Wide CIs preclude the ability to rule out potentially clinically important effects of the additional pill strategies for hypertension control. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04129840.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mapesi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: