Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As part of a program in which we are attempting to design and synthesize antagonists of the vasopressor response to arginine-vasopressin (AVP), [1-deaminopenicillamine]arginine-vasopressin (dPAVP), [2-O-methyl)tyrosine]-arginine-vasopressin [Tyr(Me)AVP], and [1-deaminopenicillamine,2-(O-methyl)tyrosine]arginine-vasopressin [dPTyr(Me)AVP] were synthesized by the solid-phase method and assayed for vasopressor, antidiuretic, and oxytocic activities. Tyr(Me)AVP has a vasopressor potency of 9.7 +/- 0.5 units/mg and an antidiuretic potency of 386 +/- 36 units/mg. These values are 2.5 and 120%, respectively, of the corresponding potencies of AVP. The analogue is an antagonist of the in vitro response to oxytocin (pA2 = 7.44 +/- 0.12). dPAVP has an antivasopressor pA2 of 7.45 +/- 0.11. Its antidiuretic potency is 42.2 +/- 2 units/mg, 2.5% that of its parent, 1-[deamino]arginine-vasopressin (dAVP). It is an antagonist of the in vitro response to oxytocin (pA2 value = 6.93 +/- 0.10). dPTyr(Me)AVP has an antivasopressor pA2 of 7.96 +/- 0.05 and an antidiuretic potency of 3.5 +/- 0.5 units/mg. It is also an antagonist of the in vitro oxytocic response to oxytocin (pA2 value = 7.61 +/- 0.14). It is thus one of the most potent vasopressor antagonists reported to date.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bańkowski et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: