Why the study?
The risk of sudden cardiac death and atrial fibrillation increases in smokers, but the relationships between repolarization and depolarization predictors of sudden cardiac death on routine ECG in this population required investigation.
Does smoking alter ECG repolarization and depolarization markers associated with sudden cardiac death compared to non-smokers?
Does smoking alter ECG repolarization and depolarization markers associated with sudden cardiac death compared to non-smokers?
Smoking is associated with significant alterations in ECG repolarization and depolarization markers, which correlate with smoking duration and may indicate an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ECG marker elevations associated with smoking; hypothesis-generating for SCD risk and requires prospective validation.
Backgroung: The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) increase in smokers. This study aimed to determine the relationships between the repolarization and depolarization predictors of SCD in routine electrocardiography (ECG) in smokers. Methods: Between January and August-2019, ninety-eight healthy patients smoking for more than five years were included in the study group by simple random sampling. The control group consisted of one hundred twenty-two non-smokers. In the study and control group, following a routine physical examination and blood tests, P wave dispersion in the right precordial leads (PWdR) and the left precordial leads (PWdL), T peak-end interval in the right precordial leads (Tp-eR) and the left precordial leads (Tp-eL), QRS dispersion in the right precordial leads (dQRSR) and the left precordial leads (dQRSL), and QRS duration values in the right precordial leads (QRSR) and the left precordial leads (QRSL) were calculated in routine 12-lead ECG + right precordial leads. Results: There was a statistically significant moderate positive correlation between dQRSRxTp-eR/QRSR-value and smoking time in the study group. Also, there was a statistically significant weak negative correlation between dQRSLxTp-eL/QRSL-value and smoking time in the study group (Respectively, R=0.52, and P<0.01, R=0.41 and P<0.01). There was a significant difference between correlation ratio of dQRSRxTp-eR/QRS-value and smoking time and dQRSLxTp-eL/QRSL-value and smoking time in the study group (Z=5.73, p<0.01). Conclusions: In the current smokers, dQRSRxTp-eR/QRSR and dQRSLxTp-eL/QRSL values significantly higher than in the control group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coşgun et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: