Why the study?
The study aimed to determine the impact of a novel anesthesia technique on clinical outcomes and complications in geriatric patients with severe systemic disease undergoing hip surgery.
Does fascia iliaca compartment block plus total intravenous anesthesia improve clinical outcomes and reduce complications compared to general anesthesia in geriatric patients with ASA IV undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Does fascia iliaca compartment block plus total intravenous anesthesia improve clinical outcomes and reduce complications compared to general anesthesia in geriatric patients with ASA IV undergoing hip fracture surgery?
In geriatric patients with severe systemic disease undergoing hip fracture surgery, combining fascia iliaca compartment block with total intravenous anesthesia reduced ICU admissions, hospital length of stay, and postoperative opioid consumption compared to general anesthesia, without affecting mortality.
May reduce ICU use and hospital stay in ASA IV hip fracture patients; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to determine the impact of a novel technique of anesthesia administration on the clinical outcomes and complications in geriatric patients with severe systemic disease undergoing hip surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients aged > 65 years with severe systemic disease that was a constant of life [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV] who underwent surgery for hip fracture between January 2018 and January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I [fascia iliaca compartment block plus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (FICB + TIVA)] and Group II [general anesthesia (GA)]. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative morbidity, Visual Analog Scale score, and consumption of analgesics. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality (5 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.85) and 1-year mortality (15 vs. 12%, p = 0.73) between the groups. Group I had significantly lower ICU requirements (p = 0.01) and shorter lengths of ICU stay (p < 0.001) and hospital stay (p < 0.001). Moreover, a smaller proportion of patients in Group I required postoperative morphine or oral opiates. CONCLUSION: Geriatric patients who underwent hip surgery under FICB + TIVA required fewer ICU admissions, shorter lengths of ICU and hospital stay, and had lesser postoperative opioid consumption than those who were under GA. Hence, we recommend the novel FICB + TIVA technique for hip fracture surgery in geriatric patients with poor general health status and high surgical risks (ASA IV).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: