Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Power plants are prime candidates to apply CO 2 capture for final storage as a mitigation option for climate change. Many CO 2 capture concepts make use of a sorption−desorption cycle to separate CO 2 from flue gas or O 2 from air. These include commercial absorption processes, as well as processes using new sorbent formulations, adsorption, and high-temperature chemical looping cycles for CO 2 and O 2 . All of these new processes must confront the large scale of carbon flows typical in a power plant. In this work, a common mass balance for all of these processes is used to define a parameter that highlights the minimum sorbent performance required to keep sorbent makeup costs at an acceptable level. A well-established reference system for which reliable commercial data exist (absorption with monoethanolamine, MEA) is used as a technoeconomic baseline to show that some of the sorbents being proposed in the open literature might need to be tested under laboratory conditions for tens of thousands of sorption−desorption cycles before they can be further considered as viable options for CO 2 capture from power plants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abánades et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: