Why the study?
Measuring carotid artery velocity time integral is easier and requires less expertise than left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral, but its efficacy in predicting fluid responsiveness in sepsis and septic shock needed evaluation.
Does CAVTI predict fluid responsiveness as effectively as LVOTVTI in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock?
Does CAVTI predict fluid responsiveness as effectively as LVOTVTI in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock?
CAVTI is not a reliable surrogate for LVOTVTI to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
CAVTI should not replace LVOTVTI for fluid responsiveness assessment in septic shock; prospective validation needed in sepsis.
Background: Transthoracic echocardiography is a reliable method to measure a dynamic change in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOTVTI) and stroke volume (SV) in response to passive leg raising (PLR) and can predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Measuring carotid artery velocity time integral (CAVTI) is easier, does not depend on adequate cardiac window, and requires less skill and expertise than LVOTVTI. The aim of this study is to identify the efficacy of CAVTI and LVOTVTI pre-and post-PLR in predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: After the institutional ethics committee's clearance and informed written consent, 60 critically ill mechanically ventilated patients aged 18 to 65 years were recruited in this prospective parallel-group study with 20 patients in each group: sepsis (group S), septic shock (group SS), and control (group C). Demographic parameters and baseline acute physiology, age and chronic health evaluation-II and sequential organ failure assessment scores were noted. LVOTVTI, SV, and CAVTI were measured before and after PLR along with other hemodynamic variables. Patients having a change in SV more than 15% following PLR were defined as "responders. " Results: Twenty-three patients (38.33%) were responders. Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve for CAVTI could predict responders in control and sepsis patients only. The correlation coefficients between pre-and post-PLR CAVTI and LVOTVTI were 0.530 (p = 0.016), 0.440 (p = 0.052), and 0.044 (p = 0.853) in control, sepsis, and septic shock patients, respectively. Conclusion: Following PLR, CAVTI does not predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients and the correlation between CAVTI and LVOTVTI is weak in septic shock patients and only modest in sepsis patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowhan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: