Why the study?
Does thrombosuction using an export aspiration catheter improve restoration to TIMI flow grade 3 in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI?
Does thrombosuction using an export aspiration catheter improve restoration to TIMI flow grade 3 in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI?
Thrombosuction using an export aspiration catheter during primary PCI for AMI improves angiographic coronary flow, although it did not significantly reduce major adverse cardiac events at 6 months.
PURPOSE: Effective myocardial reperfusion after primary PCI for an AMI in lesions with a thrombus is limited by distal embolization and the slow/no reflow phenomenon. We evaluated the efficacy of a thrombus reduction technique using an export aspiration catheter for thrombosuction during primary PCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 62 patients with AMIs who underwent primary PCI and had a thrombi burden during thrombosuction using an EAC (EAC group; n=31) or without thrombosuction (control group; n=31). RESULTS: Thrombosuction with an EAC was performed safely in all the patients in EAC group without any complications. After the PCI, restoration to a TIMI flow grade 3 was significantly more frequent in the EAC group (26/31 vs. 20/31, p < 0.05). However, the TIMI perfusion grade did not differ between the two groups. Further, the corrected TIMI frame counts were lower in the EAC group (23.9 +/- 15.1 vs. 34.8 +/- 22.5, p < 0.05). Although there was no statistical significance, a greater incidence of distal embolization was observed in the control group (16.1%, 5/31) as compared to the EAC group (0/31) (p= 0.056). However, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 1 and 6 months did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For AMIs, thrombosuction with an EAC before or during PCI is a safe and potentially effective method for restoration of the coronary flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: