Key result
Thrombosuction using the Export Aspiration Catheter before primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction significantly improved the recovery rate to TIMI 3 flow compared to PCI alone (83.9% vs 64.5%, p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does thrombosuction using the Export Aspiration Catheter prior to primary PCI improve angiographic outcomes and reduce MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=62)
No
Does thrombosuction using the Export Aspiration Catheter prior to primary PCI improve angiographic outcomes and reduce MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 83.9% vs 64.5%
p-value: p=<0.05
Thrombosuction using the Export Aspiration Catheter prior to primary PCI in AMI patients is a safe and effective method to improve coronary flow and reduce corrected TIMI frame count, though it did not significantly reduce MACE at 6 months in this small cohort.
Background and Objectives:Effective myocardial reperfusion following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI, in lesions with a thrombus, is limited by distal embolization and slow/no reflow phenomenon.We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a thrombus reduction technique, using the export aspiration catheter for thrombosuction prior to primary PCI for AMI.Subjects and Methods:We analyzed 61 AMI patients who had a thrombus burden on angiography, after having undergone primary PCI, either with or without EAC (EAC group; n=31, 24 males, mean ages 54.7±11.8years)(control group; n=31, 20 males, mean ages 65.5±12.2years).After the primary PCI, the angiographic findings and clinical outcomes at 1 and 6 months were recorded.Results:The procedural and angiographic success rates were 100 (31/31) and 93.5 (29/31), and 100 (31/31) and 87.1% (27/31), respectively.After PCI, the recovery rate to TIMI 3 flow was higher in the EAC than the control group (26/31 vs. 20/31, p<0.05), and the corrected TIMI frame count was less in the EAC than the control group (23.9±15.1 vs. 34.8±22.5,p<0.05).However, there were no different in the TIMI perfusion grade between the two groups.Although there was no statistical significance, distal embolization was more commonly observed in control (16.1%, 5/31) than the EAC group (0/31)(p=0.056).There were no differences in the incidences of MACE at 1 (0 vs. 7.7%, p=0.237) and 6 months (6.9 vs. 0%, p=0.500) between two groups.In the 31 patients who underwent successful thrombosuction, gross thrombi were obtained from 25 (80.6%).Conclusion:In AMI, the use of thrombosuction, with EAC prior to PCI, provides a simple, rapid and potentially effective method for removal of the thrombus burden and restoration of coronary flow.(Korean Circulation J 2005;35:172-179) KEY WORDS:Acute myocardial infarction;Percutaneous coronary angioplasty;Thrombus aspiration. 서 론급성 심근경색증에서 풍선 도자나 스텐트를 이용한 일차 적 관동맥 중재술은 혈전용해제와 더불어 현재까지 가장 효과적인 치료 방법으로 알려져 있다.1)2)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=62). Thrombosuction using the Export Aspiration Catheter (EAC) vs. Primary PCI without EAC was evaluated on Recovery rate to TIMI 3 flow after PCI (p=<0.05). Thrombosuction using the Export Aspiration Catheter before primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction significantly improved the recovery rate to TIMI 3 flow compared to PCI alone (83.9% vs 64.5%, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: