Key result
In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, thrombus aspiration was associated with significantly higher overall survival at one year compared to conventional PCI (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.20-0.81; P=0.010).
Why the study?
Does thrombus aspiration prior to primary PCI improve survival and MACE-free survival in STEMI patients with occluded infarct-related arteries?
Observational (n=313)
Does thrombus aspiration prior to primary PCI improve survival and MACE-free survival in STEMI patients with occluded infarct-related arteries?
Hazard Ratio: 0.41 (95% CI 0.2–0.81)
p-value: p=0.010
In a real-world registry of STEMI patients with occluded arteries, thrombus aspiration prior to primary PCI was associated with improved procedural success and 1-year survival compared to conventional PCI.
Should not yet change STEMI PCI practice; leaves open a survival benefit hypothesis for randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of thrombus aspiration in a real-world all-comer patient population with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. BACKGROUND: Catheter thrombus aspiration in primary PCI was beneficial in randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We enrolled 313 STEMI patients presenting with TIMI Flow Grade 0 or 1 in the infarct related artery at baseline angiogram undergoing primary PCI. PATIENTS were divided in two groups based on whether thrombus aspiration was attempted. This decision was left at operator's discretion. Procedural and long-term clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups: 194 (62%) received thrombus aspiration and 119 underwent conventional PCI. Thrombus aspiration was associated with significantly lower post-PCI TIMI Frame Count values (19 +/- 15 vs. 25 +/- 17; P = 0.002) and higher TIMI Flow Grade 3 (92% vs. 73%; P < 0.001). Postprocedural myocardial perfusion assessed by myocardial blush grade (MBG) was significantly increased in the thrombus aspiration group (MBG 3: 44% vs. 21%; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups in clinical outcome at 30 days. At one year, patients treated with thrombus aspiration showed significantly higher overall survival (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.81; log-rank P = 0.010) and MACE-free survival (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.85; log-rank P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world all-comer STEMI patients with occluded infarct-related artery, thrombus aspiration prior to PCI improves coronary flow, myocardial perfusion, and long-term clinical outcome as compared with PCI in the absence of thrombus aspiration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangiacapra et al. (2010) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=313). Thrombus aspiration vs. Conventional PCI was evaluated on Overall survival at one year (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.81, p=0.010). In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, thrombus aspiration was associated with significantly higher overall survival at one year compared to conventional PCI (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.20-0.81; P=0.010).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: