Diabetic rats exhibit a slower rate of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation compared to controls, which varies by vessel type and is not improved by acute vitamin C supplementation.
Impaired vasorelaxation kinetics in diabetic models unaffected by vitamin C; leaves open mechanisms and translational human studies.
The rate of adjustment of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation was examined in the aorta, iliac and femoral arteries of eight control and eight diabetic rats with and without supplementation with vitamin C. Vessels were constricted using 10(-5) M phenylephrine (PE) and relaxed with 10(-4) M acetylcholine (ACh condition) or 10(-4) M ACh plus 10(-4) M vitamin C (ACh + vitamin C condition) in a myography system. Vasorelaxation was modelled as a mono-exponential function using a non-linear regression analysis. The adjustment (τ) of vasorelaxation was faster in control (6.6 ± 3.2 s) compared to diabetic rats (8.4 ± 3.4 s) (p < 0.05). The time-to-steady-state tended to be shorter in control (32.0 ± 13.9 s) compared to diabetic rats (38.0 ± 15.0 s) (p = 0.1). ACh + vitamin C did not speed the vasorelaxation response. The τ for vasorelaxation was shorter in the femoral (6.5 ± 2.7 s) and iliac (6.8 ± 2.5 s) compared to the aorta (9.2 ± 4.2 s) (p < 0.05). The rate of vasorelaxation was greater in the femoral (3.2 ± 1.4%·s(-1)) compared to the iliac (2.0 ± 1.0%·s(-1)) and aorta (1.1 ± 0.4%·s(-1)) in both groups and in the iliac compared to the aorta (p < 0.05) in the control group. In conclusion, the vasorelaxation response was vessel specific with a slower rate of adjustment in diabetic compared to control animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murias et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: