Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: During the 12th International Histocompatibility Workshop, a collaborative study between 35 laboratories was conducted on a group of highly allosensitized patients who had received a kidney transplant from 1981 to 1995. The major goal of the study was to assess how serum screening against a large cell panel could determine donor HLA mismatch acceptability in relation to graft outcome. METHODS: Twenty laboratories participated in an extensive screening of 92 high panel-reactive antibody (PRA) sera from patients at 29 transplant centers worldwide; each patient had received a kidney allograft from an HLA-A,B mismatched unrelated donor. Screening was done by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity and antihuman globulin augmentation techniques using a common protocol and shared standardized reagents. After an extensive quality-control assessment, we selected data from 14 participants who had screened the sera against a combined panel of 535 HLA-typed cells. RESULTS: With the 2x2 table-based Multiscreen computer program, we could readily determine for virtually every patient the significant correlations between serum reactivity and the presence of panel cell markers, including private and public HLA-A,B epitopes and amino acid residues assigned from published sequencing data. Donor mismatch acceptability was assessed at the amino acid residue level. In the complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (n=49; PRA=84.1+/-12.1%) and antihuman globulin (n=60; PRA=92.5+/-5.8%) groups, the 3-month graft survivals were 28% and 30% lower for unacceptable residue mismatches. CONCLUSIONS: These studies underscore the importance of a comprehensive serum screening analysis in the selection of appropriately mismatched donors for highly sensitized transplant patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duquesnoy et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: