Why the study?
Does carotid ultrasound screening for IMT and plaque accurately identify individuals with coronary heart disease?
Does carotid ultrasound screening for IMT and plaque accurately identify individuals with coronary heart disease?
Carotid ultrasound screening for IMT or plaque lacks sufficient discriminatory performance to be a worthwhile screening test for coronary heart disease.
Carotid IMT or plaque screening lacks accuracy for coronary heart disease; confirms it is not a worthwhile test and should not change practice.
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery ultrasound is a possible screening test for future coronary heart disease (CHD) events to select individuals for preventive treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the screening performance of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and carotid plaque in the identification of individuals with CHD. METHODS: Meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies, reporting carotid IMT or plaque in individuals with and without CHD. Screening performance (detection rates [DRs] for specified false-positive rates [FPRs]) was assessed from the relative Gaussian distributions of IMT among individuals with and without CHD and from the proportion of affected and unaffected individuals with plaque. RESULTS: Eighteen studies, involving 2920 individuals with CHD (mean age range 46-73 years) and 41,941 without (aged 44-73 years) were included in the meta-analysis. For plaque the DR was 62% for an FPR of 30%; likelihood ratio (2.1 [95% CI 1.6-2.4]). For IMT, the DR was 65% for the same 30% FPR (IMT cut-off >or=0.82 mm); likelihood ratio 2.2 (1.9-2.5). The results were similar in case-control and cohort studies. CONCLUSION: Neither carotid plaque nor IMT has a CHD screening performance that is sufficiently discriminatory between affected and unaffected individuals to be a worthwhile screening test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wald et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: