February 4, 2023Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesOpen Access

Literature analysis demonstrates either relative identity of early and long-term results of reimplantation and remodeling procedures, or an advantage of reimplantation in terms of freedom from late mortality and residual aortic insufficiency.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

The effectiveness and durability of reimplantation versus remodeling in valve-sparing aortic root replacement remain subjects of ongoing debate in cardiac surgery.

Does reimplantation compared to remodeling improve long-term outcomes and reduce residual aortic insufficiency in patients undergoing aortic root valve-sparing surgery?

Population

Patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic root replacement

Comparison

Reimplantation versus remodeling techniques

Design

Literature review

Authors

РКР. Н. Комаров AIA.M. Ismailbaev ADA. N. Dzyundzya

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

May favor reimplantation for long-term outcomes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.

Structured PICO

Does reimplantation compared to remodeling improve long-term outcomes and reduce residual aortic insufficiency in patients undergoing aortic root valve-sparing surgery?

Population

Patients undergoing aortic root valve-sparing surgery

Intervention

Reimplantation technique (David procedure)

Comparator

Remodeling technique (Yacoub procedure)

Outcome

Early and long-term clinical outcomes, freedom from late mortality, and residual aortic insufficiencyhard clinical

Reimplantation may provide better long-term freedom from mortality and residual aortic insufficiency compared to remodeling in aortic root valve-sparing surgery.

Cite This Study

Комаров et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a891410d5f4e697bb131fca https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4s-182-193

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

February 4, 2023Complex Issues of Cardiovascular DiseasesOpen Access

Literature analysis demonstrates either relative identity of early and long-term results of reimplantation and remodeling procedures, or an advantage of reimplantation in terms of freedom from late mortality and residual aortic insufficiency.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

The effectiveness and durability of reimplantation versus remodeling in valve-sparing aortic root replacement remain subjects of ongoing debate in cardiac surgery.

Does reimplantation compared to remodeling improve long-term outcomes and reduce residual aortic insufficiency in patients undergoing aortic root valve-sparing surgery?

Population

Patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic root replacement

Comparison

Reimplantation versus remodeling techniques

Design

Literature review

Authors

РКР. Н. Комаров AIA.M. Ismailbaev ADA. N. Dzyundzya

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

May favor reimplantation for long-term outcomes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.

Structured PICO

Does reimplantation compared to remodeling improve long-term outcomes and reduce residual aortic insufficiency in patients undergoing aortic root valve-sparing surgery?

Population

Patients undergoing aortic root valve-sparing surgery

Intervention

Reimplantation technique (David procedure)

Comparator

Remodeling technique (Yacoub procedure)

Outcome

Early and long-term clinical outcomes, freedom from late mortality, and residual aortic insufficiencyhard clinical

Reimplantation may provide better long-term freedom from mortality and residual aortic insufficiency compared to remodeling in aortic root valve-sparing surgery.

Cite This Study

Комаров et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a891410d5f4e697bb131fca https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4s-182-193

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark