Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 2020Journal of Thoracic DiseaseOpen Access

Reimplantation linked to ~66% lower late mortality vs. remodeling for aortic root aneurysms.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement is an important treatment for aortic root aneurysms, but outcomes between reimplantation and remodeling techniques needed evaluation.

Does the reimplantation technique reduce mortality and reoperation compared to the remodeling technique in patients undergoing valve-sparing surgery for aortic root aneurysms?

Comparison

Reimplantation vs remodeling techniques

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies

Key result

The reimplantation technique for aortic root aneurysms was associated with a significantly lower risk of late mortality compared with remodeling (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.71; P=0.004).

Authors

Zhuoming Zhou
Zhuoming ZhouCross-Cutting Cardiology
MLMengya LiangSun Yat-sen UniversitySHSuiqing HuangSun Yat-sen University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support reimplantation preference in valve-sparing root repair; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=1,672)

Structured PICO

Does the reimplantation technique reduce mortality and reoperation compared to the remodeling technique in patients undergoing valve-sparing surgery for aortic root aneurysms?

P
Population
1,672 patients with aortic root aneurysms from 14 retrospective cohort studies comparing reimplantation (n=1,011) versus remodeling (n=661) techniques.
I
Intervention
Reimplantation technique for valve-sparing aortic root replacement (n=1,011)
C
Comparator
Remodeling technique for valve-sparing aortic root replacement (n=661)
O
Outcome
Early mortality, late mortality, aortic valve-related reoperation, and postoperative moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR)hard clinical

Main Result

Relative Risk: 0.34 (95% CI 0.17–0.71)

p-value: p=0.004

In patients undergoing valve-sparing surgery for aortic root aneurysms, the reimplantation technique is associated with significantly lower risks of late mortality and reoperation compared to the remodeling technique.

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Aortic root aneurysms (n=1,672). Reimplantation technique vs. Remodeling technique was evaluated on Late mortality (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.71, p=0.004). The reimplantation technique for aortic root aneurysms was associated with a significantly lower risk of late mortality compared with remodeling (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.71; P=0.004).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa867ee8db0aff0e03e15fehttps://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1407
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Outcomes in techniques of valve sparing aortic root replacement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis2020 · 13 citations
  2. 2Remodeling versus reimplantation in aortic root surgery – comparative results and risk factors for aortic insufficiency2023
  3. 3Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation (David) technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival and clinical outcome2023 · 24 citations
  4. 4Aortic valve performance after remodelling versus reimplantation in a propensity-matched comparison2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Three decades of reimplantation of the aortic valve—the Brussels Experience2023 · 16 citations