Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We introduced co-dopants into well-known orthosilicate phosphors such as and . co-doping had a positive influence on the overall photoluminescence (PL) intensity of , and , . In the absence of barium incorporation, co-doping induced phase transformation of the host from the β to the α' phase, such that the peak location redshifted and the peak intensity decreased significantly. For and , we detected inactive energy transfer from to , despite the fact that the PL intensity was improved by the co-doping, meaning that the emission never decreased as the concentration increased. There was clear evidence supporting an energy transfer between and for , despite no conspicuous practical improvement in the PL properties. The positive influence of co-doping comes not from the energy transfer, but, rather, simply from the local structure change around the activator in the host.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: